Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct
vs
Polaris Alpha

Compare performance metrics, pricing, and capabilities of these AI models.

Key Differences
Context Length
Better
Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct: 1.0M (advantage)
Polaris Alpha: 256K (disadvantage)
Cost Efficiency
Higher Cost
Prompt: $0.30M vs
Completion: $0.60M vs

Capabilities

Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct
Modality: text->text
Inputs: text
Polaris Alpha
Modality: text+image->text
Inputs: text, image
M
Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct
moonshotai/kimi-linear-48b-a3b-instruct

Kimi Linear is a hybrid linear attention architecture that outperforms traditional full attention methods across various contexts, including short, lo...

Context Length1.0M
Prompt Price$0.30M
ReleasedNovember 8, 2025
Supports:
text->text
P
Polaris Alpha
openrouter/polaris-alpha

This is a cloaked model provided to the community to gather feedback. A powerful, general-purpose model that excels across real-world tasks, with stan...

Context Length256K
Prompt Price
ReleasedNovember 6, 2025
Supports:
text+image->text
Detailed Comparison
Feature
Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct
Polaris Alpha
Context Length1.0M256K
Prompt Price$0.30M
Completion Price$0.60M
Modalitytext->texttext+image->text
Release DateNovember 8, 2025November 6, 2025
Analysis & Recommendations

Quick Summary

This comparison reveals key trade-offs between Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct and Polaris Alpha. Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct offers a larger context window of 1.0M compared to Polaris Alpha's 256K, though Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct comes at a higher cost.

Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct Strengths

  • Larger context window (1.0M) for processing longer documents
  • Premium pricing for high-quality output
  • Specialized for text tasks
  • Latest generation model

Polaris Alpha Strengths

  • Competitive context size (256K)
  • More cost-effective per token
  • Multimodal capabilities for image analysis
  • Proven and stable model

When to Use Each Model

Choose Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct when:
  • • You need the larger context window for complex tasks
  • • Cost efficiency is not the primary concern in your use case
  • • Working with text-based tasks that benefit from deep analysis
Choose Polaris Alpha when:
  • • You need competitive context capability for long-form content
  • • Cost efficiency is important for your budget
  • • Working with images and text that require advanced processing
Explore More Comparisons

Discover other interesting model comparisons