Gemini 2.5 Flash Litevs Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana)
Compare performance metrics, pricing, and capabilities of these AI models.
Key Differences
Context Length
Better
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite: 1.0M (advantage)
Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana): 33K (disadvantage)
Cost Efficiency
Lower Cost
Prompt: $0.10M vs $0.30M
Completion: $0.40M vs $2.50M
Capabilities
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite
Modality: text+image->text
Inputs: file, image, text, audio
Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana)
Modality: text+image->text+image
Inputs: image, text
G
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite
google/gemini-2.5-flash-lite
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is a lightweight reasoning model in the Gemini 2.5 family, optimized for ultra-low latency and cost efficiency. It offers improv...
Context Length1.0M
Prompt Price$0.10M
ReleasedJuly 22, 2025
Supports:
text+image->textG
Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana)
google/gemini-2.5-flash-image
Gemini 2.5 Flash Image, a.k.a. "Nano Banana," is now generally available. It is a state of the art image generation model with contextual understandin...
Context Length33K
Prompt Price$0.30M
ReleasedOctober 7, 2025
Supports:
text+image->text+imageDetailed Comparison
| Feature | | |
|---|---|---|
| Context Length | 1.0M | 33K |
| Prompt Price | $0.10M | $0.30M |
| Completion Price | $0.40M | $2.50M |
| Modality | text+image->text | text+image->text+image |
| Release Date | July 22, 2025 | October 7, 2025 |
Analysis & Recommendations
Quick Summary
This comparison reveals key trade-offs between Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite and Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana). Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite offers a larger context window of 1.0M compared to Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana)'s 33K, though Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana) comes at a higher cost.
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Strengths
- •Larger context window (1.0M) for processing longer documents
- •More cost-effective per token
- •Multimodal capabilities for image analysis
- •Proven and stable model
Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana) Strengths
- •Competitive context size (33K)
- •Premium pricing for high-quality output
- •Specialized for image and text tasks
- •Latest generation model
When to Use Each Model
Choose Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite when:
- • You need the larger context window for complex tasks
- • Cost efficiency is important in your use case
- • Working with images and text that benefit from multimodal processing
Choose Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana) when:
- • You need competitive context capability for long-form content
- • Cost efficiency is not the primary concern for your budget
- • Working with images and text that require vision capabilities
Explore More Comparisons
Discover other interesting model comparisons