google logo
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview 06-17
vs
google logo
Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana)

Compare performance metrics, pricing, and capabilities of these AI models.

Key Differences
Context Length
Better
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview 06-17: 1.0M (advantage)
Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana): 33K (disadvantage)
Cost Efficiency
Lower Cost
Prompt: $0.10M vs $0.30M
Completion: $0.40M vs $2.50M

Capabilities

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview 06-17
Modality: text+image->text
Inputs: file, image, text, audio
Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana)
Modality: text+image->text+image
Inputs: image, text
G
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview 06-17
google/gemini-2.5-flash-lite-preview-06-17

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is a lightweight reasoning model in the Gemini 2.5 family, optimized for ultra-low latency and cost efficiency. It offers improv...

Context Length1.0M
Prompt Price$0.10M
ReleasedJune 17, 2025
Supports:
text+image->text
G
Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana)
google/gemini-2.5-flash-image

Gemini 2.5 Flash Image, a.k.a. "Nano Banana," is now generally available. It is a state of the art image generation model with contextual understandin...

Context Length33K
Prompt Price$0.30M
ReleasedOctober 7, 2025
Supports:
text+image->text+image
Detailed Comparison
Feature
google logo
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview 06-17
google logo
Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana)
Context Length1.0M33K
Prompt Price$0.10M$0.30M
Completion Price$0.40M$2.50M
Modalitytext+image->texttext+image->text+image
Release DateJune 17, 2025October 7, 2025
Analysis & Recommendations

Quick Summary

This comparison reveals key trade-offs between Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview 06-17 and Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana). Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview 06-17 offers a larger context window of 1.0M compared to Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana)'s 33K, though Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana) comes at a higher cost.

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview 06-17 Strengths

  • Larger context window (1.0M) for processing longer documents
  • More cost-effective per token
  • Multimodal capabilities for image analysis
  • Proven and stable model

Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana) Strengths

  • Competitive context size (33K)
  • Premium pricing for high-quality output
  • Specialized for image and text tasks
  • Latest generation model

When to Use Each Model

Choose Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview 06-17 when:
  • • You need the larger context window for complex tasks
  • • Cost efficiency is important in your use case
  • • Working with images and text that benefit from multimodal processing
Choose Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana) when:
  • • You need competitive context capability for long-form content
  • • Cost efficiency is not the primary concern for your budget
  • • Working with images and text that require vision capabilities
Explore More Comparisons

Discover other interesting model comparisons